Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 1 (2025)

Multi-Objective Design Optimization of Thermal Engineering Systems using Rao Algorithms

Submitted
December 30, 2025
Published
2025-12-30

Abstract

Thermal engineering systems include devices or processes where heat transfer plays a major role, such as heat exchangers, refrigeration units, combustion engines, solar collectors, cooling systems in electronics, etc. These systems often have multiple performance objectives like minimizing energy consumption, maximizing heat transfer, reducing costs, improving efficiency and reliability, etc. Design optimization aims to determine the best configuration and parameters for these systems within physical, operational, and economical constraints. The number of objectives considered for optimization may be one or more than one. This study employs three optimization algorithms, known as Rao algorithms, to handle both constrained and unconstrained thermal system optimization problems under single- and multi-objective settings. Their multi-objective extensions-MO-Rao algorithms-are effectively utilized to solve selected two- and three-objective thermal engineering case studies. Additionally, the BHARAT decision-making method is applied to identify the best compromise solution from the set of Pareto-optimal non-dominated solutions. Because the optimization is performed on fast-evaluating RSM models, the obtained Pareto fronts can be readily integrated into intelligent energy management frameworks, where real-time operating conditions can be mapped to pre-optimized design or control configurations. Researchers and practitioners across scientific and engineering domains may find these algorithms advantageous in solving real-world, constrained, and non-convex single-, multi-objective optimization problems.

References

  1. Y. Jaluria, Design and Optimization of Thermal Systems”, CRC Press, London, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429085789
  2. R. V. Rao, and H. S. Keesari, Design Optimization of Renewable Energy Systems, Springer Cham, Swtizerland, 2022.
  3. P. Sharma, S. Raju, Metaheuristic optimization algorithms: a comprehensive overview and classification of benchmark test functions, Soft Computing, 28 (2024) 3123-3186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09276-5
  4. R. Salgotra, P. Sharma, S. Raju, A. H. Gandomi, A contemporary systematic review on meta-heuristic optimization algorithms with their MATLAB and Python code reference, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 31 (2024), 1749-1822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-10030-1
  5. R. V. Rao, H. S. Keesari, J. Taler, P. Oclon, D. Taler, Elitist Rao algorithms and R-method for optimization of energy systems, Heat Transfer Engineering, 44 (2023) 926-950. https://doi.org/10.1080/01457632.2022.2113448
  6. R. V. Rao, Rao algorithms: Three metaphor-less simple algorithms for solving optimization problems, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 11 (2020) 107-130. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2019.6.002
  7. K. Sörensen, Metaheuristics – the metaphor exposed, International Transactional in Operational Research, 22 (2015) 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12001
  8. F. Campelo, C. Aranha, Evolutionary computation bestiary, https:// github. com/ fcamp elo/ ECBestiary, 2021, Version visited last on 8 July 2024.
  9. C. L. C. Aranha, F. Villalón, M. Dorigo, R. Ruiz, M. Sevaux, K. Sörensen, T. Stützle, Metaphor-based metaheuristics, a call for action: the elephant in the room, Swarm Intelligence, 16 (2021) 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-021-00202-9
  10. K. Sörensen, M. Sevaux, F. Glover, A history of metaheuristics. In: Martí R, Pardalos P, Resende M (eds), Handbook of Heuristics, Springer, 791-808, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07124-4_4
  11. C. L. C. Villalón, T. Stützle, M. Dorigo, Cuckoo search ≡ (µ+λ)–evolution strategy — A rigorous analysis of an algorithm that has been misleading the research community for more than 10 years and nobody seems to have noticed, Technical Report TR/IRIDIA/2021-006, IRIDIA, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium, 2021.
  12. M. Sarhani, S. Voß, R. Jovanovic, Initialization of metaheuristics: comprehensive review, critical analysis, and research directions, International Transactions in Operational Research, 30 (2023) 3361-3397. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13237
  13. Rajwar, K. Deep, S. Das, An exhaustive review of the metaheuristic algorithms for search and optimization: taxonomy, applications, and open challenges, Artificial Intelligence Review, 56 (2023) 13187-13257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10470-y
  14. L. Velasco, H. Guerrero, A. Hospitaler, A literature review and critical analysis of metaheuristics recently developed, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 31 (2024) 125-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09975-0
  15. B. Benaissa, M. Kobayashi, M. A. Ali, T. Khatir, M. E. A. E. Elmeliani, Metaheuristic optimization algorithms: An overview, HCMCOUJS-Advances in Computational Structures, 14 (2024) 34-62. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.acs.en.14.1.47.2024
  16. R. V. Rao, J. P. Davim, Single, multi-, and many-objective optimization of manufacturing processes using two novel and efficient algorithms with integrated decision-making, Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 9 (2025), 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp9080249
  17. R. V. Rao, J. P. Davim, Optimization of different metal casting processes using three simple and efficient advanced algorithms, Metals, 15 (2025), 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15091057
  18. R. V. Rao, J. Taler, D. Taler, Jaya Lakshmi, A unified optimization approach for heat transfer systems using the BxR and MO-BxR algorithms, Energies, 19 (1) (2026), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010034
  19. R. V. Rao, Rao algorithms: Three metaphor-less simple algorithms for solving optimization problems, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 11 (2020), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2019.6.002
  20. R. V. Rao. BHARAT: A simple and effective multi-criteria decision-making method that does not need fuzzy logic, Part-1: Multi-attribute decision-making applications in the industrial environment, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 15 (2024) 13-40. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2023.12.003
  21. R. V. Rao, R. J. Lakshmi, Ranking of Pareto-optimal solutions and selecting the best solution in multi- and many-objective optimization problems using R-method, Soft Computing Letters 3 (2021) 100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socl.2021.100015
  22. S. Nekahi, F. S. Moghanlou, K. Vaferi, H. Ghaebi, M. Vajdi, and H. Nami, Optimizing finned-microchannel heat sink design for enhanced overall performance by three different approaches: Numerical simulation, artificial neural network, and multi-objective optimization, Applied Thermal Engineering, 245 (2024) 122835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.122835
  23. H. Dong, X. Chen, S. Yan, D. Wang, J. Han, Z. Guan, Z. Cheng, Y. Yin, S. Yang, Multi-objective optimization of lithium-ion battery pack thermal management systems with novel bionic lotus leaf channels using NSGA-II and RSM, Energy, 314 (2025) 134226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.134226