Journal of Smart Energy Systems and Sustainable Technologies

Articles

Vol. 2 (2026)

Enterprise Architecture Software Tools for Sustainable Smart Energy Governance, Information Systems and Infrastructure: A Multi Criteria Evaluation Across Regulated Sectors from the Czech Republic

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31875/2978-6436.2026.02.01
Submitted
July 1, 2026
Published
2026-07-01

Abstract

Digital transformation (DT) in smart energy systems requires Enterprise Architecture (EA) tools capable of modeling complex digital energy infrastructures, including smart metering ecosystems, distributed energy resources (DERs), flexibility market platforms, and grid‑edge systems. To support these increasingly data‑driven environments, EA tools must provide strong modeling capabilities, interoperability, and governance functions suitable for smart grid and energy platform development. This study applies a structured multi‑criteria evaluation of seven widely used EA tools (Enterprise Architect - Sparx, Archi - freeware, Horizzon - BizzDesign, LeanIX - SAP, Hopex - MEGA International, VisualParadigm - Visual Paradigm, Abacus - Avolution: based on modeling expressiveness, repository features, usability, visualization, and decision‑support functions. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), weights were assigned to reflect priorities of digital energy infrastructures, including DER integration, energy data governance, lifecycle planning, and regulatory compliance. The evaluation, conducted in the energy utilities and public administration sectors in the Czech Republic, highlights significant variation in standards support, integration with smart metering, and collaborative modeling functions relevant to smart grid planning. Findings show that EA tools differ notably in their suitability for representing energy system architectures and supporting sustainable digital transformation. The study offers practical guidance for selecting EA tools aligned with the needs of smart energy organizations pursuing scalable, interoperable, and resilient digital energy ecosystems.

References

  1. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2022 - Software, systems and enterprise — Architecture description, (n.d.). https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html (accessed April 22, 2026).
  2. J. Wang, B. Wang, A Systemic Evaluation of Energy Digital Transformation Policies for the G20 Group of Countries: A Four-Dimensional Framework and Cross-National Quantitative Analysis, Sustainability 2025, Vol. 17, Page 9301 17 (2025) 9301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209301
  3. S. Kotusev, S. Kurnia, R. Dilnutt, Enterprise architecture artifacts as boundary objects: An empirical analysis, Inf. Softw. Technol. 155 (2023) 107108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107108
  4. TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition Downloads | www.opengroup.org, (n.d.). https://www.opengroup.org/togaf-standard-10th-edition-downloads (accessed December 22, 2025).
  5. N. Kaya, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods (MCDM): A Bibliometric Analysis (1974-2024), Journal of Business Economics and Finance 13 (2024) 55-67. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2024.1940
  6. A.O. Amole, O. Olatidoye, R.A. Owosibo, O.B. Adewuyi, D.E. Ighravwe, Analytical Hierarchal Process based Multi-Criteria Sustainability Assessment of Renewable Energy Systems, IEEE International Conference on Emerging and Sustainable Technologies for Power and ICT in a Developing Society, Nigercon (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/NIGERCON62786.2024.10927242
  7. K. Wasielewska, M. Ganzha, M. Paprzycki, P. Szmeja, M. Drozdowicz, I. Lirkov, C. Bǎdicǎ, Applying Saaty’s Multicriterial Decision Making Approach in Grid Resource Management, Information Technology and Control 43 (2014) 73-87. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.itc.43.1.4587
  8. ArchiMate Licensed Downloads | www.opengroup.org, (n.d.). https://www.opengroup.org/archimate-licensed-downloads (accessed December 22, 2025).
  9. J.W. Ross, P. Weill, D.C. Robertson, Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution, (2006) 234. https://books.google.com/books/about/Enterprise_Architecture_as_Strategy.html?hl=cs&id=ng3AbVQlEncC (accessed December 22, 2025).
  10. D. Hindarto, The Management of Projects is Improved Through Enterprise Architecture on Project Management Application Systems, International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS) 3 (2023) 151-161. https://doi.org/10.35870/ijsecs.v3i2.1512
  11. E. Atencio, G. Bustos, M. Mancini, Enterprise Architecture Approach for Project Management and Project-Based Organizations: A Review, Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 9801 14 (2022) 9801. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169801
  12. A. Chwiłkowska-Kubala, S. Cyfert, K. Malewska, K. Mierzejewska, W. Szumowski, The impact of resources on digital transformation in energy sector companies. The role of readiness for digital transformation, Technol. Soc. 74 (2023) 102315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102315
  13. V. Akberdina, A. Osmonova, Digital transformation of energy sector companies, E3S Web of Conferences 250 (2021) 06001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125006001
  14. B. Siuta-Tokarska, S. Kruk, P. Krzemiński, A. Thier, K. Żmija, Digitalisation of Enterprises in the Energy Sector: Drivers—Business Models—Prospective Directions of Changes, Energies 2022, Vol. 15, Page 8962 15 (2022) 8962. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15238962
  15. P. Maroufkhani, K.C. Desouza, R.K. Perrons, M. Iranmanesh, Digital transformation in the resource and energy sectors: A systematic review, Resources Policy 76 (2022) 102622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102622
  16. M. Mahmood, P. Chowdhury, R. Yeassin, M. Hasan, T. Ahmad, N.U.R. Chowdhury, Impacts of digitalization on smart grids, renewable energy, and demand response: An updated review of current applications, Energy Conversion and Management: X 24 (2024) 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100790
  17. Z. Nazari, P. Musilek, Impact of Digital Transformation on the Energy Sector: A Review, Algorithms 2023, Vol. 16, Page 211 16 (2023) 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/a16040211
  18. Enterprise Architecture Framework for Renewable Energy Integration in Utility Systems | Request PDF, (n.d.). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390145417_Enterprise_Architecture_Framework_for_Renewable_Energy_Integration_in_Utility_Systems (accessed April 21, 2026).
  19. S. Kotusev, S. Kurnia, R. Dilnutt, R. van de Wetering, S. Kotusev, S. Kurnia, R. Dilnutt, R. van de Wetering, The Structuring of Enterprise Architecture Functions in Organizations, Business & Information Systems Engineering 66 (2024) 465-488. https://aisel.aisnet.org/bise/vol66/iss4/4 (accessed April 21, 2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00845-4
  20. G. Wang, J. Yang, Q. Zhuang, K. Li, J. Jiang, Research on the Driving Mode of Enterprise Architecture Based on Business Ability Decoupling for Digital Transformation of Power Industry, (2023) 216-223. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-326-9_23
  21. I. Ilin, A. Levina, A. Dubgorn, K. Frolov, A. Ershova, S. Chikirev, The Role of Enterprise Architecture in the Digital Transformation of Energy, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 951 (2024) 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56677-6_5
  22. R. Bonepalli, Enterprise Architecture Framework for Renewable Energy Integration in Utility Systems, International Journal of Information Technology and Management Information Systems (IJITMIS) 16 (2025) 130-142. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJITMIS_16_01_011
  23. M. Lukáš, M. Ulman, M. Pavelka, P. Ambruz, J. Vaněk, Support of Project & Program Management of Digital Transformation Initiatives by Holistic Enterprise Architecture in Sectors of National Economy: A Case of the Czech Republic, Procedia Comput. Sci. 256 (2025) 1542-1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.02.289
  24. Best Enterprise Architecture Tools: Top 8 Platforms, (n.d.). https://erstudio.com/blog/enterprise-architecture-tools/ (accessed April 21, 2026).
  25. Best Enterprise Architecture Tools Reviews 2025 | Gartner Peer Insights, (n.d.). https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/enterprise-architecture-tools (accessed December 21, 2025).
  26. 2025 Gartner® Magic QuadrantTM for Enterprise Architecture Tools, (n.d.). https://bizzdesign.com/analyst-report/gartner-magic-quadrant-enterprise-architecture-tools-2025 (accessed April 21, 2026).
  27. S. Tsafarakis, K. Zervoudakis, A. Andronikidis, E. Altsitsiadis, Fuzzy self-tuning differential evolution for optimal product line design, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 287 (2020) 1161-1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.018
  28. M. Tavana, M. Soltanifar, F.J. Santos-Arteaga, Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution, Annals of Operations Research 2021 326:2 326 (2021) 879-907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04432-2
  29. S. Frish, I. Talmor, O. Hadar, M. Shoshany, A. Shapira, Enhancing consistency of AHP-based expert judgements: A new approach and its implementation in an interactive tool, MethodsX 14 (2025) 103341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103341
  30. Uvítání a obsah webu [Architektura eGovernmentu ČR], (n.d.). https://archi.gov.cz/ (accessed May 3, 2026).
  31. Rámec obsahu a výstupů architektur [Architektura eGovernmentu ČR], (n.d.). https://archi.gov.cz/nar_dokument:ramec_obsahu_a_vystupu_architektur (accessed May 3, 2026).
  32. O.Ye. Kaminskyi, Y.O. Yereshko, S.O. Kyrychenko, Digital Transformation of University Education in Ukraine: Trajectories of Development in the Conditions of New Technological and ECONOMIC ORDER, Information Technologies and Learning Tools 64 (2018) 128-137. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v64i2.2083
  33. S. Giraldo, D. la Rotta, C. Nieto-Londoño, R.E. Vásquez, A. Escudero-Atehortúa, Digital Transformation of Energy Companies: A Colombian Case Study, Energies 2021, Vol. 14, Page 2523 14 (2021) 2523. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092523