Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 6 (2019)

Stress Field Analysis of Polymer Composite with Orthogonally Reinforced Fibers

DOI
https://doi.org/10.31875/2410-4701.2019.06.5
Submitted
October 31, 2019
Published
2019-10-31

Abstract

The photoelastic technique was used to analyze the stress field in glass fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite. Two glass fiber bundles with a diameter of 0.2 mm were reinforced in orthogonal directions. The composite was subjected to diametrical compression with two orientation of fibers with respect to the loading axis, i.e. 00/900 and 450/1350. A circular polariscope with dark-field arrangement was used to analyze the stress field. The isochromatic fringe pattern nearby fiber/matrix interface revealed that there was strong adhesion between the fiber and matrix. Distorted fringes were observed nearby fiber region which indicated efficient load transfer from matrix to the fiber. It was observed that composite with 450/1350 orientation of fibers showed more principal stress difference in the direction perpendicular to the loading axis.

References

  1. Ramesh M, Palanikumar K, Reddy KH. Mechanical property evaluation of sisal–jute–glass fiber reinforced polyester composites. Composites Part B: Engineering 2013; 48: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.12.004
  2. Srivastava VK, Kumar P. Stress field around graphene nanoplates coated carbon fiber strand reinforced in polymer matrix. Materials Research Express 2019; 6: 045305. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aafaa6
  3. Zhou X, Dai G, Guo W, Qunfang, Lin. Influence of functionalized polyolefin on interfacial adhesion of glass fiber-reinforced polypropylene. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2000; 76(8): 1359-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000523)76:8<1359::AID-APP17>3.0.CO;2-A
  4. Li N, Wu Z, Huo L, Zong L, Guo Y, Wang J, et al. One-step functionalization of carbon fiber using in situ generated aromatic diazonium salts to enhance adhesion with PPBES resins. RSC Advances 2016; 6(74): 70704-14. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA12717G
  5. Zhang RL, Gao B, Ma QH, Zhang J, Cui HZ, Liu L. Directly grafting graphene oxide onto carbon fiber and the effect on the mechanical properties of carbon fiber composites. Materials & Design 2016; 93: 364-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.003
  6. Zhang RL, Gao B, Du WT, Zhang J, Cui HZ, Liu L, et al. Enhanced mechanical properties of multiscale carbon fiber/epoxy composites by fiber surface treatment with graphene oxide/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2016; 84: 455-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.021
  7. Sakai T, Iihara Y, Yoneyama S. Photoelastic stress analysis of the fiber/matrix interface in a single-fiber composite. Journal of the Japanese Society for Experimental Mechanics 2014; 14(Special_Issue): s110-s5.
  8. Herrera-Franco PJ, Drzal LT. Comparison of methods for the measurement of fibre/matrix adhesion in composites. Composites 1992; 23(1): 2-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(92)90282-Y
  9. Cox H. The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials. British Journal of Applied Physics 1952; 3(3): 72. https://doi.org/10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302
  10. Sampson RC. A stress-optic law for photoelastic analysis of orthotropic composites. Experimental Mechanics 1970; 10(5): 210-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02324034
  11. Vázquez-Rodrı´guez JM, Herrera-Franco PJ, González-Chi PI. Analysis of the interface between a thermoplastic fiber and a thermosetting matrix using photoelasticity. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2007; 38(3): 819-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.08.003
  12. Jones RM. Mechanics of composite materials: CRC press 2014.