Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 7 (2020)

Fracture and Permeability Properties of Artificial Fly Ash and Slag aggregate Concretes at Different Water-to-Cement Ratios

DOI
https://doi.org/10.31875/2410-4701.2020.07.02
Submitted
March 27, 2020
Published
2020-03-27

Abstract

This study presents an experimental investigation on the effect of artificial aggregate utilization fracture and permeability properties of concretes. For this, two types of artificial aggregates, namely, artificial fly ash aggregate (AFA) from cold bonding agglomeration process of fly ash and Portland cement and artificial slag aggregate (ASA) from cold bonding agglomeration process of ground granulated blast furnace slag and Portland cement, were replaced with natural aggregate to coarse aggregate. Moreover, to investigate the influence of water-to-cement ratio, three different water-tocement ratios of 0.35, 0.45, and 0.55 were considered in the concrete production. The concretes were tested for the mechanical property in terms of as compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and splitting, net flexural strength, and fracture energy and also permeability property such as water sorptivity, water penetration, gas permeability, and resistance to chloride ion penetration. The test results were also analyzed by means of statistical technique, namely, GLM-ANOVA. It was found that the use of cold bonded fly ash and slag aggregates were very effective on the performance characteristics of concretes depending on w/c ratio.

References

  1. Safiuddin MD, Salam MA, Jumaat MZ. Effects of recycled concrete aggregate on the fresh properties of selfconsolidating concrete. Arc CivMechEng 2011; 11(4): 1023- 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60093-4
  2. Khaleel OR, Al-Mishhadan SA, Razak HA. The effect of coarse aggregate on fresh and hardened properties of selfcompacting concrete (SCC). Procedia Eng 2011; 14: 805-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.102
  3. Zhang MH, Gjorv OE. Characteristics of lightweight aggregates for high strength concrete. ACI Mater J 1991; 88(2): 150-8. https://doi.org/10.14359/1924
  4. Turkish Statistical Institute, Press Release 8, 2010, http: //www.turkstat.gov.tr/.
  5. Bilgen G, Kavak A, Yıldırım ST,Çapar OF. Blast furnace slag and its importance in the construction sectors, in: 578 The Second National Solid Waste Management Conference, Mersin, Turkey, 2010.
  6. Zhang MH, Gjorv OE. Mechanical properties of high strength lightweight concrete. ACI Mater J 1991; 88(3): 240-7. https://doi.org/10.14359/1839
  7. Videla C, Lopez M. Mixture proportioning methodology for structural sandlightweight concrete. ACI Mater J 2000; 97(3): 281-9. https://doi.org/10.14359/4623
  8. Haque N, Lopez M. Strength and durability of lightweight concrete in hot marine exposure conditions. Mater Struct 1999; 32: 533-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481638
  9. Al-Khaiyat H, Haque N. Strength and durability of lightweight and normal weight concrete. J Mater Civil Eng 1999; 11(3): 231-5. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:3(231)
  10. Khaloo AR, Kim N. Effect of curing condition on strength and elastic modulus of lightweight high-strength concrete. ACI Mater J 1999; 96(4): 485-90. https://doi.org/10.14359/650
  11. Haque MN, Al-K haiat H, Kayali O. Strength and durability of lightweight concrete. Cement Concr Comp 2007; 26(4): 307- 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00141-5
  12. Chi JM, Huang R, Yang CC, Yang JJ. Effect of aggregate properties on the strength and stiffness of the lightweight concrete. Cement Concr Comp 2003; 25: 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00020-3
  13. Yang CC. Approximate elastic moduli of lightweight aggregate. Cement Concr Res 1997; 27(7): 1021-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00099-9
  14. Chang TP, Shieh MM. Fracture properties of lightweight concrete. Cement Concr Res 1996; 26(2): 181-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00198-0
  15. Gesoğlu M, Özturan T, Güneyisi E. Shrinkage cracking of lightweight concrete made with cold-bonded fly ash aggregates. Cement Concr Res 2004; 34(7): 1121-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.11.024
  16. Güneyisi E, Gesoğlu M, İpek S. Effect of steel fiber addition and aspect ratio on bond strength of cold-bonded fly ash lightweight aggregate concretes. Construction and Building Materials 2013; 47: 358-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.059
  17. Kayali O, Haque MN, Zhu B. Drying shrinkage of fiberreinforced lightweight aggregate concrete containing fly ash. CemConcr Res 1999; 29: 1835-1840. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00179-9
  18. Güneyisi E, Gesoğlu M, Booya E. Fresh properties of selfcompacting cold bonded fly ash lightweight aggregate concrete with different mineral admixtures. Materials and Structures 2012; 45: 1849-1859. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9874-6
  19. ASTM C 127. Standard test method for specific gravity and absorption of coarseaggregate, Annual Book of ASTM Standards; 2007.
  20. Gesoğlu M. Effects of lightweight aggregate properties on mechanical, fracture, and physical behavior of lightweight concretes. PhD thesis, 2004. Istanbul, Boğaziçi University.
  21. Gesoğlu M, Güneyisi E, Öz HÖ. Properties of lightweight aggregates produced with col-bonding pelletization of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Materials and Structures 2012; 45: 1535-46. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9855-9
  22. Joseph G, Ramamurthy K. Influence of fly ash on strength and sorption characteristics of cold-bonded fly ash aggregate concrete. Const Build Mater 2009; 23: 1862-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.018
  23. ASTM C39/C39M-12. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. Annual book of ASTM Standard; 2012.
  24. ASTM C469/C469M−10 (2010) Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression. Book of Standards Vol.04-02, 5 pages.
  25. ASTM C 496. Standard test method for split tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. Annual Book of ASTM Standards; 1994.
  26. RILEM 50-FMC (1985) Committee of fracture mechanics of concrete. Determination of fracture energy of mortar and concrete by means of three-point bend tests on notched beams. Mater Struct 18(106): 285-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472918
  27. TS EN 12390-8. Testing hardened concrete - Part 8: Depth of penetration of water under pressure. Institute of Turkish Standards, Ankara, Turkey; 2002.
  28. Rilem TC 116-PCD. Permeability of concrete as a criterion of its durability. Mater Struct 1999; 32: 174-9.
  29. ASTM C1202. Test method for electrical indication of concrete’s ability to resist chloride ion penetration, Annual Book of ASTM Standards; 2006.
  30. Chan SYN, Ji X. Water sorptivity and chloride diffusivity of oil shale ash concrete. Constr Build Mater 1998; 12: 177-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(98)00006-3
  31. Chindaprasirt P, Chotithanormc C, Cao HT, Sirivivatnanon V. Influence of fly ash fineness on the chloride penetration of concrete. Constr Build Mater 2007; 21: 356-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.010
  32. Kollek JJ. Determination of the permeability of concrete to oxygen by the cembureau method-recommendation. Mater Struct 1989; 22: 225-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472192