Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer


Vol. 8 (2021)

Numerical Model of Eddy Current Inspection with DC Magnetic Field Associated

November 30, 2021


Most non-destructive techniques can be well represented in a virtual environment, in particular, eddy current testing (ECT) simulation is a useful and well-established tool to predict and represent real inspection situations permitting testing customization in a fast, cheap and efficient way. Conventional ECT generally works with low-intensity magnetic fields, however, for advanced variations of the technique, where external DC magnetic fields can be applied to locally decrease the magnetic permeability, there is no Finite Element Method (FEM) packages available to deal with such nonstandard model. Many authors [1] and [2] have presented this ECT solution for different industrial applications using external DC magnetization to carry nonlinear ferromagnetic materials to the saturation level of the magnetization curve to increase the ECT depth penetration. In general, ECT modelling calculation is benefited by properties of steady-state regime where all magnetic fields are oscillating at the same frequency not permitting through multi-frequency calculation. The present work proposes a simulation solution for such a case where DC magnetic field is associated with ECT. A theoretical model is presented together with experimental results validation.


  1. Reber K, Boenisch A. Advanced Electromagnetic Technology and Tools for Subsea Inspection, Subsea Pipelines Integrity Management Conference 2012.
  2. Camerini C, Sacramento R, Areiza M, Rocha A, Santos R, Rebello J, Pereira G. Eddy current techniques for super duplex stainless steel characterization, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 2015; 388: 96-100, ISSN 0304-8853.
  3. Xie S, Duan Z, Li J, Tong Z, Tian M and Chen Z. A novel magnetic force transmission eddy current array probe and its application for nondestructive testing of defects in pipeline structures. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 2020; 309: 112030.
  4. Zhao Y, Qi P, Xie Z, Bai P, Chen HE, Xie S, and Chen Z. A new array eddy current testing probe for inspection of small-diameter tubes in Tokamak fusion devices. Fusion Engineering and Design 2020; 157: 111627.
  5. Zhao Y, Qi P, Xie Z, Bai P, Chen HE, Xie S and Chen Z. A new array eddy current testing probe for inspection of small-diameter tubes in Tokamak fusion devices. Fusion Engineering and Design 2020; 157: 111627.
  6. James R, Faisal Haider M, Giurgiutiu V, and Lilienthal D. A simulative and experimental approach toward Eddy current nondestructive evaluation of manufacturing flaws and operational damage in CFRP composites. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems 2020; 3(1).
  7. Sophian A, Tian GY, Taylor D and Rudlin J. Electromagnetic and eddy current NDT: a review. Insight 2001; 43(5): 302-306.
  8. Hollaus K and Schöberl J. Some 2-D multiscale finite-element formulations for the eddy current problem in iron laminates. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2018; 54(4): 1-16.
  9. Oh S, Choi G, Lee D, Choi M and Kim K. Analysis of Eddy-Current Probe Signals in Steam Generator U-Bend Tubes Using the Finite Element Method. Applied Sciences 2021; 11(2): 696.
  10. Barrarat F, Rayane K, Helifa B and Lefkaier IK. Characterization of subsurface cracks in eddy current testing using machine learning methods. International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields 2021; e2876.
  11. Li S and Cui X. An edge-based smoothed finite element method for nonlinear magnetostatic and eddy current analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2018; 62: 287-302.
  12. Tian C, Zhong Y, Wei L, Lei Y, Chen B, Gao Y and Yuan J. A coupled method for evaluating eddy current loss of NdFeB permanent magnets in a saturated core fault current limiter. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2017; 53(6): 1-4.
  14. Foucher F, Kalai A, Kelb W, Ramadan S and Delemontez J. A modeling study of the SLOFECTM Eddy Current system. In 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing 2016.
  15. Deng Z, Sun Y, Kang Y, Song K and Wang R. A permeability-measuring magnetic flux leakage method for inner surface crack in thick-walled steel pipe. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 2017; 36(4): 1-14.
  16. Horai S, Hirata K & Niguchi N. Flux-focusing eddy current sensor with magnetic saturation for detection of water pipe defects. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics 2016 52(3-4): 1231-1236.
  17. Rifai D, Abdalla AN, Khamsah N, Aizat M and Fadzli M. Subsurface defects evaluation using eddy current testing. Indian J. Sci. Technol 2016; 9: 10-17485.
  18. Jackson JD. Classical electrodynamics 1999.
  19. Bönisch A, Dijkstra FH and de Raad JA. Magnetic flux and SLOFEC inspection of thick walled components. In Proc. 15th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing 2000; 15: 1-8.
  20. Ida WLN, Palanisamy R. Eddy Current Probe Design Using Finite Element Analysis, Materials evaluation 1983; 41: 1389-1493.
  21. Mengbao Fan, Pingjie Huang, Bo Ye, Dibo Hou, Guangxin Zhang, Zekui Zhou. Analytical modeling for transient probe response in pulsed eddy current testing, NDT & E International 2009; 42(5): 376-383.
  22. Villone F. Simulation of thin cracks with finite resistivity in eddy current testing, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2000; 36(4): 1706-1709.
  23. Santandrea L and Le Bihan Y. Using COMSOL-multiphysics in an eddy current non-destructive testing context. In Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference 2010.