Journal of Modern Mechanical Engineering and Technology

Articles

Vol. 13 (2026)

Current-Driven Restructuring of Ion-Induced Cu-Incorporated Carbon Nanofibers: In Situ TEM Observation and Electro-Thermal Analysis

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31875/2409-9848.2026.13.10
Submitted
October 9, 2026
Published
2026-11-02

Abstract

In this study, we observed the structural change of a Cu-incorporated carbon nanofiber (Cu-CNF) under current flow by in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and estimated the power needed for the change using an electro-thermal model. The Cu-CNFs were grown on the edge of a Cu foil by Ar+ ion irradiation at room temperature. The selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) rings of the as-grown fiber gave d-spacings of 0.2087, 0.1808, 0.1282 and 0.1095 nm, indexed to fcc Cu with no separate graphite reflection. Under a constant bias, no structural change was observed for the first 2.0 s. Between 2.0 and 2.8 s, the fine Cu crystallites agglomerated into a continuous core of about 1.5 µm in length and 60–120 nm in width, and the surrounding carbon transformed into graphitic layers with an interlayer spacing of about 0.38 nm. At 3.2 s, the fiber broke at a Cu-depleted segment about 0.5 µm above the probe. A one-dimensional steady-state heat conduction model showed that 12–390 µW is required to heat the fiber to 600–800 °C, whereas the nominal circuit (200 mV, 200 kΩ, up to 1 µA) supplies 0.2 µW or less. The model also suggests that the heating concentrates in the Cu-free segment once a Cu core forms, which can explain the breaking point. The results indicate that the power actually delivered to the fiber was higher than the nominal value, or that a non-thermal process, such as electron-beam irradiation, assisted the change. These two cases could not be separated, because the voltage across the fiber was not recorded. The finding can be significant for designing in situ electrical processing of metal–carbon nanofibers.

References

  1. Geim, A. K. and Novoselov, K. S. 2007. The Rise of Graphene. Nature Materials. 6(3): 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1849
  2. Li, X., Cai, W., An, J., Kim, S., Nah, J., Yang, D., Piner, R., Velamakanni, A., Jung, I., Tutuc, E., Banerjee, S. K., Colombo, L. and Ruoff, R. S. 2009. Large-area Synthesis of High-quality and Uniform Graphene Films on Copper Foils. Science. 324(5932): 1312-1314. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171245
  3. Luong, D. X., Bets, K. V., Algozeeb, W. A., Stanford, M. G., Kittrell, C., Chen, W., Salvatierra, R. V., Ren, M., McHugh, E. A., Advincula, P. A., Wang, Z., Bhatt, M., Guo, H., Mancevski, V., Shahsavari, R., Yakobson, B. I. and Tour, J. M. 2020. Gram-scale Bottom-up Flash Graphene Synthesis. Nature. 577(7792): 647-651. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1938-0
  4. Barreiro, A., Börrnert, F., Avdoshenko, S. M., Rellinghaus, B., Cuniberti, G., Rümmeli, M. H. and Vandersypen, L. M. K. 2013. Understanding the Catalyst-free Transformation of Amorphous Carbon into Graphene by Current-induced Annealing. Scientific Reports. 3: 1115. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01115
  5. Huang, Z., Yao, Y., Pang, Z., Yuan, Y., Li, T., He, K., Hu, X., Cheng, J., Yao, W., Liu, Y., Nie, A., Sharifi-Asl, S., Cheng, M., Song, B., Amine, K., Lu, J., Li, T., Hu, L. and Shahbazian-Yassar, R. 2020. Direct Observation of the Formation and Stabilization of Metallic Nanoparticles on Carbon Supports. Nature Communications. 11: 6373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20084-5
  6. Wang, Z., Ogata, H., Morimoto, S., Fujishige, M., Takeuchi, K., Muramatsu, H., Hayashi, T., Ortiz-Medina, J., Mohd Yusop, M. Z., Tanemura, M., Terrones, M., Hashimoto, Y. and Endo, M. 2015. Microwave Plasma-induced Graphene-sheet Fibers from Waste Coffee Grounds. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 3(28): 14545-14549. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA03833B
  7. Black, J. R. 1969. Electromigration - A Brief Survey and Some Recent Results. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 16(4): 338-347. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-ED.1969.16754
  8. Ho, P. S. and Kwok, T. 1989. Electromigration in Metals. Reports on Progress in Physics. 52(3): 301-348. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/52/3/002
  9. Chen, S., Huang, J. Y., Wang, Z., Kempa, K., Chen, G. and Ren, Z. F. 2005. High-bias-induced Structure and the Corresponding Electronic Property Changes in Carbon Nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters. 87(26): 263107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2155116
  10. Mølhave, K., Gudnason, S. B., Pedersen, A. T., Clausen, C. H., Horsewell, A. and Bøggild, P. 2006. Transmission Electron Microscopy Study of Individual Carbon Nanotube Breakdown Caused by Joule Heating in Air. Nano Letters. 6(8): 1663-1668. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl060821n
  11. Begtrup, G. E., Ray, K. G., Kessler, B. M., Yuzvinsky, T. D., Garcia, H. and Zettl, A. 2007. Probing Nanoscale Solids at Thermal Extremes. Physical Review Letters. 99(15): 155901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.155901
  12. Vincent, P., Purcell, S. T., Journet, C. and Binh, V. T. 2002. Modelization of Resistive Heating of Carbon Nanotubes during Field Emission. Physical Review B. 66(7): 075406. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.075406
  13. Regan, B. C., Aloni, S., Ritchie, R. O., Dahmen, U. and Zettl, A. 2004. Carbon Nanotubes as Nanoscale Mass Conveyors. Nature. 428(6986): 924-927. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02496
  14. Kashid, R. V., Yusop, M. Z., Takahashi, C., Kalita, G., Panchakarla, L. S., Joag, D. S., More, M. A. and Tanemura, M. 2013. Field Emission Characteristics of Pristine and N-doped Graphene Measured by In-situ Transmission Electron Microscopy. Journal of Applied Physics. 113(21): 214311. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4809930
  15. Rosmi, M. S., Yusop, M. Z., Kalita, G., Yaakob, Y., Takahashi, C. and Tanemura, M. 2014. Visualizing Copper Assisted Graphene Growth in Nanoscale. Scientific Reports. 4: 7563. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07563
  16. Sharma, S., Rosmi, M. S., Yaakob, Y., Yusop, M. Z. M., Kalita, G., Kitazawa, M. and Tanemura, M. 2018. In Situ TEM Synthesis of Carbon Nanotube Y-junctions by Electromigration Induced Soldering. Carbon. 132: 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.037
  17. Sharma, S., Jaisi, B. P., Araby, M. I., Elnobi, S., Ayhan, M. E., Kalita, G. and Tanemura, M. 2019. The Mo Catalyzed Graphitization of Amorphous Carbon: An In Situ TEM Study. RSC Advances. 9(59): 34377-34381. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA05936A
  18. Tanemura, M., Okita, T., Yamauchi, H., Tanemura, S. and Morishima, R. 2004. Room-temperature Growth of a Carbon Nanofiber on the Tip of Conical Carbon Protrusions. Applied Physics Letters. 84(19): 3831-3833. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745109
  19. Sim, H. S., Lau, S. P., Ang, L. K., You, G. F., Tanemura, M., Yamaguchi, K., Zamri, M. and Yusop, M. 2008. Field Emission from a Single Carbon Nanofiber at Sub 100 nm Gap. Applied Physics Letters. 93(2): 023131. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2959826
  20. Zamri, M., Ghosh, P., Wang, Z. P., Kawagishi, M., Hayashi, A., Hayashi, Y. and Tanemura, M. 2010. Direct Growth of Carbon Nanofibers on Metal Mesh Substrates by Ion Irradiation Method. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B. 28(2): C2C9-C2C12. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.3318694
  21. Azizir-Rahim, M., Yusop, M. Z. M., Othman, M. H. D., Ibrahim, M. and Tanemura, M. 2019. In Situ Transmission Electron Microscope: Joule Heating Effect on Graphitization of Copper Incorporated Carbon Nanofiber. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 16(3): 6931-6939. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.16.3.2019.08.0520
  22. Bullen, A. J., O’Hara, K. E., Cahill, D. G., Monteiro, O. and von Keudell, A. 2000. Thermal Conductivity of Amorphous Carbon Thin Films. Journal of Applied Physics. 88(11): 6317-6320. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1314301
  23. Robertson, J. 2002. Diamond-like Amorphous Carbon. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports. 37(4-6): 129-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-796X(02)00005-0
  24. Bayer, B. C., Bosworth, D. A., Michaelis, F. B., Blume, R., Habler, G., Abart, R., Weatherup, R. S., Kidambi, P. R., Baumberg, J. J., Knop-Gericke, A., Schloegl, R., Baehtz, C., Barber, Z. H., Meyer, J. C. and Hofmann, S. 2016. In Situ Observations of Phase Transitions in Metastable Nickel (Carbide)/Carbon Nanocomposites. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 120(39): 22571-22584. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01555
  25. Chai, Y., Hazeghi, A., Takei, K., Chen, H.-Y., Chan, P. C. H., Javey, A. and Wong, H.-S. P. 2010. Graphitic Interfacial Layer to Carbon Nanotube for Low Electrical Contact Resistance. 2010 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM). 9.2.1-9.2.4. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2010.5703327
  26. Ugarte, D. 1992. Curling and Closure of Graphitic Networks under Electron-beam Irradiation. Nature. 359(6397): 707-709. https://doi.org/10.1038/359707a0
  27. Egerton, R. F., Li, P. and Malac, M. 2004. Radiation Damage in the TEM and SEM. Micron. 35(6): 399-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2004.02.003
  28. Banhart, F. 1999. Irradiation Effects in Carbon Nanostructures. Reports on Progress in Physics. 62(8): 1181-1221. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/62/8/201
  29. Börrnert, F., Avdoshenko, S. M., Bachmatiuk, A., Ibrahim, I., Büchner, B., Cuniberti, G. and Rümmeli, M. H. 2012. Amorphous Carbon under 80 kV Electron Irradiation: A Means to Make or Break Graphene. Advanced Materials. 24(41): 5630-5635. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201202173
  30. Lim, S. C., Jang, J. H., Bae, D. J., Han, G. H., Lee, S., Yeo, I.-S. and Lee, Y. H. 2009. Contact Resistance between Metal and Carbon Nanotube Interconnects: Effect of Work Function and Wettability. Applied Physics Letters. 95(26): 264103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3255016