Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)

Positioning the Angle of Attack Sensor on an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Wing

DOI
https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9848.2016.03.01.4
Submitted
March 27, 2016
Published
2016-03-27

Abstract

Two vane type angle of attack sensors, small and large, are tested on the suction surface of a wing of an unmanned aerial vehicle to evaluate the wing interference with angle of attack reading. Tests are performed in the University of Manitoba¢‚¬„¢s wind tunnel with the maximum Reynolds number of 4.5 x 105 to find the optimal location to place sensors on the wing. Each angle of attack sensor is tested at four positions on the wing to investigate the impact of flow deflection caused by the presence of the wing on the sensor readings. Results show that readings are highly sensitive to the normal clearance between the wing and the angle of attack sensor. Accuracy of sensor readings increases by increasing normal clearance. Spanwise placements indicate that the minimum wing interference with angle of attack sensor readings occurs when the sensor is placed beyond the wing tip. To investigate the effect of ailerons on angle of attack sensor readings, sensors are also tested with half, full and with no aileron deflection positions. The effect of aileron deflection is noticeable in large angle of attack sensor readings, while it has a negligible effect on the small sensor readings.

References

  1. Stevens BL and Lewis FL. Aircraft Control and Simulation. John Wiley and Sons, Hobokren, NJ, 2nd ed., 2003.
  2. Etkin B and Reid LD. Dynamics of Flight: Stability and Control. John Wiley and Sons. New York, NY, 3rd ed., 1996.
  3. Beard RW and McLain TW. Small Unmanned Aircraft: Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400840601
  4. Ramprasadh C and Arya H. Multi-stage fusion algorithm for estimation of aerodynamic angles in mini aerial vehicle. in Proc. 49th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting, Orlando, FL, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-1287
  5. Cho A, Kim V, Lee S and Kee C. Wind estimation and airspeed calibration using a UAV with a single-antenna GPS receiver and pitot tube. IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic Systems 2011; 47: 109-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2011.5705663
  6. Cho A, Kang YS, Park BJ and Yoo CS. Airflow angle and wind estimation using GPS/INS navigation data and airspeed. in Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), Gwangju, Korea, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iccas.2013.6704159
  7. Johansen TA, Cristafaro A, Sørensen KL, Hansen JM and Fossen TI. On estimation of wind velocity, angle-of-attack and sideslip angle of small uavs using standard sensors. In International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icuas.2015.7152330
  8. Johnson EN and Fontaine S. Use of Flight Simulation to Complement Flight Testing of Low-cost UAVs. AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit. Montreal, Canada 2001; AIAA 2001-4059.
  9. Sorton EF and Hammaker S. Simulated Flight Testing of an Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Using FlightGear. Infotech@Aerospace, Arlington, VA 2005; AIAA 2005-7083.
  10. Gracey W. Summary of methods of measuring AOA on aircraft 1958.