Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Journal of Modern Mechanical Engineering and Technology

Articles

Vol. 8 (2021)

Experimental Investigation on the Advantages of Dry Machining over Wet Machining during Turning of AISI 1020 Steel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.31875/2409-9848.2021.08.2
Submitted
November 30, 2021
Published
2021-11-30

Abstract

In this study, the experiment was conducted to investigate the advantage of dry machining over wet machining during turning of AISI 1020 steel using cemented carbide tool on a CNC lathe machine. Surface roughness and cutting temperature were measured by VOGEL surface roughness tester and infrared thermometer respectively. The experiments were conducted based on Taguchi L9 orthogonal array design. Surface roughness, cutting temperature, tool life, and machining cost were analyzed graphically. The average surface roughness and cutting temperature achieved with wet machining was 2.01 µm and 26.540C, which was 17.41% and 44.86% respectively, lower than dry machining. The high cutting temperature in dry turning result in short tool life, which was 41.15% shorter than wet turning. The machining cost of wet turning was about 56% greater than the cost of dry turning. The cost of coolant in wet turning is 42.88% greater than that of the cutting tools. The highest cost was shared by tool cost, which was 81.33% of the total cost for dry turning, while 70.00% of the total cost was shared by coolant cost for wet turning. Results revealed that dry turning is more economical than wet turning.

References

  1. Munish Kumar Gupta, Qinghua Song, Zhanqiang Liu, Murat Sarikaya, Muhammad Jamil, Mozammel Mia, Vinod Kushvaha, Anil Kumar, Singla, Zhixiong Li, 2021. Ecological, economical and technological perspectives based sustainability assessment in hybrid-cooling assisted machining of Ti-6Al-4 V alloy, Sustainable Materials and Technologies, Vol. 26, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00218
  2. Ç.V. Yıldırım, T. Kıvak, M. Sarıkaya, and Ş. Şirin, 2020. Evaluation of tool wear, surface roughness/topography and chip morphology when machining of Ni-based alloy 625 under MQL, cryogenic cooling and Cryo MQL, Journal of Material Research and Technology, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 2079-2092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.069
  3. A. Bagherzadeh and E. Budak, 2018. Investigation of machinability in turning of difficult-to-cut materials using a new cryogenic cooling approach, Tribology International, Vol. 119, pp. 510-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.11.033
  4. Ogedengbe T.S., Abdulkareem S., and Aweda J.O., 2018. Effect of coolant temperature on machining characteristics of high carbon steel, Covenant Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 1, pp. 73-86. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322833036
  5. N.A.C. Sidik, S. Samion, J. Ghaderian, M.N.A.W.M. Yazid, 2017. Recent progress on the application of nanofluids in minimum quantity lubrication machining: a review, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 108, pp. 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.11.105
  6. Pay Jun Liew, Ainusyafiqah Shaaroni, Nor Azwadi Che Sidik, Jiwang Yan, 2017. An overview of current status of cutting fluids and cooling techniques of turning hard steel, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 114, pp. 380-394.
  7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.06.077
  8. K.K. Gajrani, D. Ram and M. Ravi Sankar, 2017. Biodegradation and hard machining performance comparison of eco-friendly cutting fluid and mineral oil using flood cooling and minimum quantity cutting fluid techniques, Journal Cleaner Production, Vol. 165, pp. 1420-1435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.217
  9. Nilesh C. Ghuge1, Dr.Ashish M. Mahalle, 2016. Influence of cutting fluid on tool wear and tool life during turning, International Journal of Modern Trend in Engineering and Research, Vol. 3, Issue 10, pp. 23-27. https://doi.org/10.21884/IJMTER.2016.3078.9LPXS
  10. Akhil CS, Ananthavishnu MH, Akhil CK, Afeez PM, and Akhilesh R, Rahul Rajan, 2016.
  11. Measurement of Cutting Temperature during Machining, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Vol. 13, Issue 2 Ver. I, pp. 102-116.
  12. Kawthar Y. AL-Dulaimi 1, Haydar Al-Ethari, and Bogdan Warcholinski, 2016. Taguchi method to optimize machining conditions affecting cemented carbide tool's wear life in turning AISI 1020 steel, Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 267-278. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309993825
  13. S. Debnath, MM. Reddy, QS. Yi, 2016. Influence of cutting fluid conditions and cutting parameters on surface roughness and tool wear in turning process using Taguchi method, Measurement, Vol. 78 pp.111-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.09.011
  14. Pradeep Kumar M., Amarnath, K., Kumar M.S, 2015. A review on heat generation in metal cutting," International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 5, Issue 4, pp. 193-197.
  15. S. Dilbag, P. Rao, 2015. Performance improvement of hard turning with solid lubricants, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 38, pp. 529-535, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1079-8
  16. S. Anton, S. Andreas, B. Friedrich, 2015. Heat dissipation in turning operations by means of internal cooling, Proc. Eng., Vol. 100, pp. 1116-1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.474
  17. M. Sarikaya, A. Güllü, 2014. Taguchi design and response surface methodology based analysis of machining parameters in CNC turning under MQL," Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 65, pp. 604-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.040
  18. Y. Kaynak, T. Lu, I.S. Jawahir, 2014. Cryogenic machining-induced surface integrity: a review and comparison with dry, MQL, and flood-cooled machining, Mach. Sci. Technol., Vol. 18, pp. 149-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2014.897836
  19. M. Bhuiyan, I. Choudhury, and M. Dahari, 2014. Monitoring the tool wear, surface roughness and chip formation occurrences using multiple sensors in turning, Journal of Manufacturing System, Vol. 33, pp. 476-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.04.005
  20. CJ. Rao, D. Sreeamulua Arun, and Tom Mathew, 2014. Analysis of tool life during turning operation by determining optimal process parameters, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 97 pp. 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.247
  21. Mikell P. Groover, 2013. Fundamental of modern manufacturibng; material, processes, and systems, fifth edition, pp. 606. https://library.villanova.edu/Casa/Record/1858997
  22. Kagade VR and Deshmukh RR, 2011. Experimental investigation of turning operation using carbide inserts, International Journal of Applied Research; Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 87-90. https://www.interscience.in/ijarme/vol1/iss2/4 https://doi.org/10.47893/IJARME.2011.1017
  23. Isik, Y, 2010. An experimental investigation on effect of cutting fluids in turning with coated carbides tool, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 56, pp. 3-10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267964128
  24. Y. Isik, 2010. An experimental investigation on effect of cutting fluids in turning with coated carbides tool, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 56, pp. 195-201. 23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267964128
  25. VS. Sharma, M. Dogra, N. Suri, 2009. Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning," International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, Vol. 49, pp. 435-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.12.010
  26. S. Palanisamy, S.D. McDonald, M.S. Dargusch, 2009. Effects of coolant pressure on chip formation while turning Ti6Al4V alloy, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, Vol. 49, pp. 739-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.02.010
  27. NI. Galanis, DE. Manolakos, NM. Vaxevanidis, 2008. Comparison between dry and wet machining of stainless steel, ICMEN, Vol. 3, pp. 91-98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251870152
  28. A. Aggarwal, H. Singh, P. Kumar, and M. Singh, 2008. Optimization of multiple quality characteristics for CNC turning under cryogenic cutting environment using desirability function, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 205, pp. 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.105
  29. D. Adler, WS. Hii, D. Michalek, and J. Sutherland, 2006. Examining the role of cutting fluids in machining and efforts to address associated environmental/health concerns, Mach. Sci. Technol. Vol. 10, pp. 23-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910340500534282
  30. D. O'sullivan and M. Cotterell, 2001. Temperature measurement in single point turning, Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 118, pp. 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00853-6
  31. Weinert KII, Sutherland JW, Wakabayashi T. 2004. Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication, CIRP Annals, Vol. 53, Issue 2, pp. 511-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60027-4
  32. P. Sreejith, B. Ngoi, 2000. Dry machining: machining of the future, Journal of Material Processing Technology. Vol. 101, pp. 287-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00445-3
  33. Tugrul Ozel, Yigit Karpat, Luýs Figueira and Paulo Davim J, 2007. Modelling of Surface Finish and Tool Flank Wear in Turning of AISI D2 Steel with Ceramic Wiper Inserts, Material Processing Technology, Vol. 189, pp. 192-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.01.021