Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 11 (2024)

A Flow Structure Interaction Method for Towed Cable System

DOI
https://doi.org/10.31875/2409-9848.2024.11.02
Submitted
March 17, 2024
Published
2024-03-16

Abstract

Abstract: The ocean towed cable system is a classic example of fluid-structure interaction (FSI). This interaction can exhibit stability or oscillation between a highly deformable moving cable and the surrounding turbulent flow. However, in dynamic simulations of towed cable systems, a constant drag coefficient for an infinite circular cylinder is often used based on experimental data. An innovative fluid-structure interaction method is introduced to obtain accurate drag distribution along cable to couple with towed system dynamics. A modified nodal position finite element method (NPFEM) coupled with Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach has been utilized to predict hydrodynamic forces along the cable. A data exchange algorithm has been developed specifically for fluid-structure interaction within the towed cable system where the cable profile is transferred to construct the flow domain while hydrodynamics is interpolated for NPFEM analysis. A topology partition around cable is applied. A multiblock grid is generated around cable. The simulation results of the fluid-structure interaction of the towing system are verified. This FSI scheme reveals how strongly hydrodynamics determine cable dynamics and induce vortex structure vibrations around a towed cable system. Parametrically controlled structured grid generation and their applicability for complex flow fields have also been discussed. Detailed descriptions of boundary layer separation evolution around spatially distributed cable are provided. This FSI scheme reveals a real strongly hydrodynamic determined cable dynamics and vortex structure induced vibrations around a towed cable system. The proposed method enhances predictive accuracy of the towed system dynamics response.

References

  1. Kundu P K, Cohen I M, David R. Fluid Mechanics (Fifth Edition) [M] 2012.
  2. Du X, Cui H, Zhang Z. A numerical method for analyzing the influence of underwater vehicle flow field on dynamic behavior of towed sonar cable array [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019; 175(MAR.1): 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.01.047
  3. Yang X, Wu J, Xu S. Dynamic analysis of underwater towed system under undulating motion mode of towed vehicle [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2022, 121: 103083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2022.103083
  4. Zhao Y, Li G, Lian L. Numerical model of towed cable body system validation from sea trial experimental data [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 226(6): 108859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108859
  5. Guan G, Zhang X, Wang Y, et al. Analytical and numerical study on underwater towing cable dynamics under different flow velocities based on experimental corrections [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2021; 114: 102768-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102768
  6. Wu J, Yang X, Xu S, et al. Numerical investigation on underwater towed system dynamics using a novel hydrodynamic model [J]. Ocean engineering, 2022; (Mar.1): 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110632
  7. Grosenbaugh M A. Dynamic Behavior of Towed Cable Systems During Ship Turning Maneuvers [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2007; 34(11-12): 1532-1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.01.002
  8. Wang Z, Gang S. Parameters influence on maneuvered towed cable system dynamics [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2015; 49: 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2014.10.009
  9. Kishore S S, Ganapathy C. Analytical investigations on loop-manoeuvre of underwater towed cable-array system [J]. Ocean Engineering, 1998; 25(6): 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-1187(97)00001-1
  10. Gao, H., Wang, Z. Dynamic Behavior of Two Part Towing Cable System During Turning. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 2018; 23: 444-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-018-1928-7
  11. Sun F J, Zhu Z H, Larosa M. Dynamic modeling of cable towed body using nodal position finite element method [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2011; 38(4): 529-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.11.016
  12. Zhu Z H. Dynamic modeling of cable system using a new nodal position finite element method [J]. Communications in numerical methods in engineering, 2010; 26(6): 692-704.
  13. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1161
  14. IMSL. Users Manual, Math/Library, Fortran Numerical library user’s guide math library 7.0. 2016.
  15. Wilcox D C. Turbulence Modeling for CFD. DCW Industries, 2006.
  16. C. Geuzaine and JF. Remacle. Gmsh: a three-dimensional finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2009; 79(11): 1309-1331. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2579
  17. Huang S. Dynamic analysis of three-dimensional marine cables [J]. Ocean Engineering, 1994; 21(6): 587-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-8018(94)90008-6
  18. Wang F, Huang G, Deng D. Dynamic response analysis of towed cable during deployment/retrieval [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2008; 13: 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-008-0245-y
  19. Srivastava V K, Sanyasiraju Y, Tamsir M. Dynamic behavior of underwater towed cable in linear profile [J]. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 2011; 2(7): 1-10.
  20. Park, H. & Jung, Dong & Koterayama, W. (2003). A Numerical and Experimental Study on Dynamics of A Towed Low-Tension Cable. Applied Ocean Research - APPL OCEAN RES. 25. 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2004.02.003
  21. Wu, Jiaming & Chwang, Allen. (2000). A hydrodynamic model of a two-part underwater towed system. Ocean Engineering. 27. 455-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(99)00006-2
  22. Rodríguez Luis Á, Armesto J A, Guanche R, et al. Simulation of marine towing cable dynamics using a finite elements method [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2020; 8(2): 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8020140
  23. Jeong Hyogu, Bai Jinshuai, Batuwatta-Gamage C.P., Rathnayaka Charith, Zhou Ying, Gu Yuan Tong. A Physics-Informed Neural Network-based Topology Optimization (PINNTO) framework for structural optimization [J]. Engineering Structures, 2023; 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115484
  24. Freitag Steffen, Peters Simon, Edler Philipp, Meschke Günther. Reliability-based optimization of structural topologies using artificial neural networks [J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2022; 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103356
  25. Palacios F, Colonno M R, Aranake A C, et al. Stanford University Unstructured (SU2): An open-source integrated computational environment for multi-physics simulation and design [J]. AIAA Journal, 2013; 2013: 1-60. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-287