Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer


Vol. 4 (2017)

The Solar Panel’s Performance Dependence on Incident Radiation Intensity and its Surface Temperature

September 12, 2017


The effect of radiation intensity and temperature on the performance parameters of a solar panel is investigated experimentally using an indoor experimental setup, designed and constructed locally at Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology, Damascus. The experiments have been carried out under various intensity levels of radiation in the range of 700- 2000W/m2. The experimental results indicate that, radiation intensity has a dominant effect on current parameters. It is found that photocurrent; short circuit current and maximum current have been increased linearly with increasing radiation intensity. So, concentrating system may be regarded as a best choice to enhance the power output of solar system. The power density of the solar panel at 30oC increased from 1.86 mW/cm2 at 1300W/m2 to 3.59 mW/cm2 at 2000W/m2. The role of temperature on the electric parameters of solar panel is also considered. The practical local possible solar panel’s temperature was considered to be in the range of 10–70oC. The experiments cover this temperature range. Experimental results show that all electrical parameters of solar panel such as maximum output power, open circuit voltage, short circuit current, efficiency and fill factor have changed with temperature variation. As well as the amount of changes in these parameters in terms of temperature value have been obtained. According to results, the most significant is the temperature dependence of the voltage which decreases with increasing temperature while the current of the solar panel slightly increases by temperature. On the other hand, it has been observed that solar panel’s temperature has a dramatic effect on voltage parameters. Open circuit voltage and maximum voltage are decrease with increasing solar panel’s temperature. So, the maximum power density of the mono-crystalline and poly-crystalline silicon solar module decreased from 43.4 and 48.76/cm2 to 36.32 and 41.88mW/cm2 for temperature 10oC and 70oC respectively. When testing the effect of temperature on French Photo watt solar cells, obtained 20 years ago and encapsulated in a solar panel locally, in the temperature range of 10–90oC, it was found that, the open circuit voltage decreases by 1.87mV/ oC which is equivalent to 0.3% of the nominal value. The short circuit current intensity decreases by 20mA/oC which is equivalent to 1% of the nominal value. When comparing these values with those of the company presented at its electronic cite, Isc = +0,06%/°C; Voc = -0,34%/°C, one can conclude that aging effect is important on short circuit current intensity.


  1. Yadav P, Tripathi B, Lokhande M and Kumar M. Effect of Temperature and Concentration on Commercial Silicon Module Based Low-Concentration Photovoltaic System. J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 2013; 5: 013113.
  2. Siefer G, Abbott GP, Baur C, Schlegl T and Bett AW. Determination of the Temperature Coefficients of Various IIIV Solar Cells. (Paper presented at the 20th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Barcelona, Spain) 2005, 6-10 June; 495-498.
  3. Durisch W, Urban J and Smestad G. Characterization of Solar Cells and Modules Under Actual Operating Conditions. Renewable Energy 1996; 8(1-4): 359-366.
  4. Skoplaki E, Boudouvis AG and Palyvos JA. A Simple Correlation for the Operating Temperature of Photovoltaic Modules of Arbitrary Mounting. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2008; 92(11): 1393-1402.
  5. Malik AQ, Ming LC, Sheng TK and Blundell M. Influence of Temperature on the Performance of Photovoltaic Polycrystalline Silicon Module in the Bruneian Climate. ASEAN J Sci Technol Dev (AJSTD) 2010; 26(2): 61-72.
  6. Franghiadakis Y and Tzanetakis P. Explicit Empirical Relation for the Monthly Average Cell-Temperature Performance Ratio of Photovoltaic Arrays. Prog Photovoltaics: Res Appl 2006; 14(6): 541-551.
  7. Malik AQ and Salmi Jan Bin Haji Damit. Outdoor Testing of Single Crystal Silicon Solar Cells. Renewable Energy 2003; 28(9): 1433-1445.
  8. Radziemska E. The Effect of Temperature on the Power Drop in Crystalline Solar Cells. Renewable Energy 2003; 28(1): 1-12.
  9. Veerachary M, Senjyu T and Uezato K. Feed Forward Maximum Power Point Tracking of PV Systems Using Fuzzy Controller. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2002; 38(3): 969-981.
  10. Veerachary M and Shinoy KS. V2-Based Power Tracking for Nonlinear PV Sources. IEE Proc: Electr Power Appl 2005; 152(5): 1263-1270.
  11. Kim IS and Youn MJ. Variable-Structure Observer for SolarArray Current Estimation in a Photovoltaic Power-Generation System. IEE Proc: Electr Power Appl 2005; 152(4): 953-959.
  12. Kim IS, Kim MB and Youn MJ. New Maximum Power Point Tracker Using Sliding-Mode Observer for Estimation of Solar Array Current in the Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2006; 53(4): 1027-1035.
  13. Dadu M, Kapoor A and Tripathi KN. Effect of Variation of I01/I02 on Short-Circuit Current and Fill Factor of a Real Solar Cell Having Resistive and Current Leakage Losses. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2001; 69(4): 353-359.
  14. Castãaner LS and Silvestre S. Modeling Photovoltaic Systems Using Pspice. (John Wiley and Sons), ISBN: 2002; 978-0-470-84527-1
  15. Perraki V and Kounavis P. Effect of Temperature and Radiation on the Parameters of Photovoltaic Modules. J Renewable Sustainable Energy 2016; 8: 013102.
  16. Luque A(Editor) and Hegedus S. (Co-Editor). Hand book of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering. (John Wiley and Sons). 2003; ISBN: 978-0-470-72169-8.
  17. Van Dyk E and Meyer EL. Analysis of the Effect of Parasitic Resistances on the Performance of Photovoltaic Modules. Renewable Energy 2004; 29(3): 333-344.
  18. Schwingshackl C, Petitta M, Wagner JE, Belluardo G, Moser D, et al. Wind Effect on PV Module Temperature: Analysis of Different Techniques for an Accurate Estimation. Energy Procedia 2013; 40: 77-86.
  19. Mahfoud A, Fathi M, Mekhilef S and Djahli F. Effect of Temperature on the GaInP / GaAs Tandem Solar Cell Performances. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER) 2015; 5(2): 629-634.
  20. Touati FA, Al-Hitmi MA and Bouchech HJ. Study of the Effects of Dust, Relative Humidity, and Temperature on Solar PV Performance in Doha: Comparison Between Mono crystalline and Amorphous PVS. International journal of green energy 2013; 10(7): 680-9.
  21. Tobnaghi DM, Madatov R and Naderi D. The Effect of Temperature on Electrical Parameters of Solar Cells. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering 2013; 2(12): 6404-6407.
  22. Krauter S. Increased Electrical Yield Via Water Flow Over the Front of Photovoltaic Panels. Solar Energy Mat Solar Cells 2004; 82(1-2): 131-137.
  23. Chenni R, Makhlouf M, Kerbache T and Bouzid A. A Detailed Modeling Method for Photovoltaic Cells. Energy 2007; 32(7): 1724-1730.
  24. Rahman MM, Hasanuzzaman M and Rahim NA. Effects of various parameters on PV-module power and efficiency. Energy Conversion and Management 2015; 103: 348-358.