Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer


Vol. 4 (2017)

Design and Performance of Two Axes Solar Tracker

September 12, 2017


The possible energy gain in the case of two axes tracking as well as a fixed system with Equator facing tilted solar PV module with latitude angle and daily optimum slope is calculated basing on Hottel clear sky radiation model (HM) and ex-terrestrial solar radiation model (ESRM). The calculated results are compared with the data obtained from a PV system with 252 Wpeak power module installed on a two axes solar tracker which was designed and constructed locally. The main components of the tracker are introduced. It was found that, the maximum possible energy gain calculated basing on HM and ESRM are practically identic. For example, on 25 August from 8 O’clock to solar noon, the hourly energy gain values of HM are 1.672, 1.336, 1.170, 1.098 and 1.097 while they are 1.677, 1.337, 1.170, 1.098 and 1.098 in the case of ESRM. The corresponding measured values on the same day are 1.746, 1.36, 1.16, 1.043 and 1.027. Thus, the theoretical data are consistent with the measured ones. Moreover, it was found that the tracked system is more economic feasible than latitude tilted similar one with a relative solar energy gain of 0.32%.


  1. Soulayman S and Hammoud M. Optimum tilt angle of solar collectors for building applications in mid-latitude zone. Energy Conversion Management 2016; 124: 20-28.
  2. Stanciu C and Stanciu D. Optimum tilt angle for flat plate collectors all over the World – A declination dependence formula and comparisons of three solar radiation models. Energy Conversion and Management 2014; 81: 133-143.
  3. Benghanem M. Optimization of tilt angle for solar module: case study for Madinah, Saudi Arabia. Applied Energy 2011; 88(4): 1427-1433.
  4. Yan R, Saha TK, Meredith P and Goodwin S. Analysis of yearlong performance of differently tilted photovoltaic systems in Brisbane, Australia. Energy Conversion and Management 2013; 74: 102-108.
  5. Gong X and Kulkarni M. Design optimization of a large scale rooftop photovoltaic system. Solar Energy 2005; 78(3): 362- 374.
  6. Kacira M, Simsek M, Babur Y and Demirkol S. Determining optimum tilt angles and orientations of photovoltaic modules in Sanliurfa, Turkey. Renewable Energy 2004; 29(8): 1265- 1275.
  7. Chang TP. The gain of single-axis tracked module according to extraterrestrial radiation. Applied Energy 2009; 86(7-8): 1074-1079.
  8. De Miguel A, Bilbao J and Diez M. Solar radiation incident on tilted surfaces in Burgos, Spain: Isotropic models. Energy Conversion and Management 1995; 36(10): 945-951.
  9. Seme S and Stumberger G. A novel prediction algorithm for solar angles using solar radiation and Differential Evolution for dual-axis sun tracking purposes. Solar Energy 2011; 85(11): 2757-1770.
  10. Nann S. Potentials for tracking photovoltaic systems and Vtroughs in moderate climates. Solar Energy 1990; 45(6): 385- 393.
  11. Tomson T. Discrete two-positional tracking of solar collectors. Renewable Energy 2008; 33(3): 400-405.
  12. Mousazadeh H, Keyhani A, Javadi A, Mobli H, Abrinia K, et al. A review of principle and Sun-tracking methods for maximizing solar systems output. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009; 13(8): 1800-1818.
  13. Abdallah S. The effect of using Sun tracking systems on the voltage-current characteristics and power generation of at plate photovoltaics. Energy Conversion and Management 2004; 45(11-12): 1671-1679.
  14. Roth P, Georgiev A and Boudinov H. Design and construction of a system for sun-tracking. Renewable Energy 2004; 29(3): 393-402.
  15. Nuwayhid RY, Mrad F and Abu-Said R. The realization of a simple solar tracking concentrator for the university research applications. Renewable Energy 2001; 24(2): 207-222.
  16. Sharan AM and Prateek M. Automation of minimum torquebased accurate solar tracking systems using microprocessors. Journal of Indian Institute of Science 2006; 86(5): 415-437.
  17. Poulek V and Libra M. New solar tracker. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 1998; 51(2): 113-120.
  18. Poulek V and Libra M. A very simple solar tracker for space and terrestrial applications. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2000; 60(2): 99-103.
  19. Lazaroiu GC, Longo M, Roscia M and Pagano M. Comparative analysis of fixed and Sun tracking low power PV systems considering energy consumption. Energy Conversion Management 2015; 92: 143-148.
  20. Eke R and Senturk A. Performance comparison of a doubleaxis sun tracking versus fixed PV system. Solar Energy 2012; 86(9): 2665-2672.
  21. Dakkak M and Babelli A. Design and Performance Study of a PV Tracking System (100W- 24Vdc/220Vac). Energy Procedia 2012; 19: 91-95.
  22. Hottel HC. A simple model for estimating the transmittance of direct solar radiation through clear atmospheres. Solar Energy 1976; 18(2): 129-134.
  23. Liu BYH and Jordan RC. The interrelationship and characteristic distribution of direct, diffuse and total solar radiation. Solar Energy 1960; 4(3): 1-19.